@article{Humphries_2020, title={Tragedia i granice pesymizmu w starożytnej i współczesnej realistycznej myśli politycznej}, url={https://ingremium.pl/index.php/IG/article/view/287}, DOI={10.34768/ig.vi14.287}, abstractNote={<p>This article explores the question of what we might discover about the nature and significance of contemporary forms of so-called “political realism” – particularly with regard to their relationship to pessimism – from a philosophical consideration of Ancient Greek tragedy on the one hand, and of such supposed ancient precursors of this way of thinking about ethical and/or political matters as Thucydides on the other. The principal thesis put forward here will be that Greek tragedy can prompt us to notice a revealing equivocation within the thinking of prominent recent and contemporary exponents of such realism, connected with what, in practice, it means to <em>withhold assent</em> from forms of morality-centred optimism on the grounds that they are perceived to be dogmatic or speculative. Such political realism, I conclude, when thus formulated, implicitly involves elements that are <em>dogmatically pessimistic</em>, even when expressly aspiring to be anti-dogmatic themselves. In order to clarify the significance of this equivocation, I draw a parallel with some issues that have emerged in the context of the reception of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy.</p&gt;}, number={14}, journal={In Gremium. Studies in History, Culture and Politics }, author={Humphries, Carl}, year={2020}, month={Dec.}, pages={223-235} }